Jessica Lynch Forums: Time Article - Jessica Lynch Forums

Jump to content

Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

Time Article Nothing new

#1 User is offline   iron-bound 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 02 June 2003 - 09:56 PM

Hardly worth posting.

http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/...-455823,00.html
0

#2 Guest_dilligafst_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 June 2003 - 09:45 AM

Actually, it was not a bad posting. Time is usually pretty good and they did not take sides, merely reiterated what have now become two sides in a rather badly managed public relations circus swirling around poor Jessica.
0

#3 User is offline   papags46 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 27-October 03

Posted 03 June 2003 - 10:30 AM

Notice that they included "BBC" a lot. Like "BBC" said this, "BBC" said that. They kinda made it look like a chain, how one news organization gets info from the other news organization. The Time wasn't like putting Jessica down like others we know mad.gif , but stating that there was a disagreement about the whole thing.
0

#4 User is offline   iron-bound 

  • Newbie
  • Pip
  • Group: Members
  • Posts: 0
  • Joined: 04-September 03

Posted 03 June 2003 - 01:58 PM

Well I didn't really think it was worth posting because it had very little information, with the existing information being rather vague.

This is why I really don't read news magazines. By the time I get them, everything in it is already old news.
0

#5 Guest_Stacey_*

  • Group: Guests

Posted 03 June 2003 - 06:01 PM

I read that at the doctor's office yesterday. It doesn't have much information.
0

Share this topic:


Page 1 of 1
  • You cannot start a new topic
  • You cannot reply to this topic

1 User(s) are reading this topic
0 members, 1 guests, 0 anonymous users