Hardly worth posting.
http://www.time.com/time/magazine/article/...-455823,00.html
Page 1 of 1
Time Article Nothing new
#2 Guest_dilligafst_*
Posted 03 June 2003 - 09:45 AM
Actually, it was not a bad posting. Time is usually pretty good and they did not take sides, merely reiterated what have now become two sides in a rather badly managed public relations circus swirling around poor Jessica.
#3
Posted 03 June 2003 - 10:30 AM
Notice that they included "BBC" a lot. Like "BBC" said this, "BBC" said that. They kinda made it look like a chain, how one news organization gets info from the other news organization. The Time wasn't like putting Jessica down like others we know , but stating that there was a disagreement about the whole thing.
#4
Posted 03 June 2003 - 01:58 PM
Well I didn't really think it was worth posting because it had very little information, with the existing information being rather vague.
This is why I really don't read news magazines. By the time I get them, everything in it is already old news.
This is why I really don't read news magazines. By the time I get them, everything in it is already old news.
#5 Guest_Stacey_*
Posted 03 June 2003 - 06:01 PM
I read that at the doctor's office yesterday. It doesn't have much information.
Share this topic:
Page 1 of 1